Business Ownership vs. Index Investing: A Deeper Look at the Buss/Lakers Debate

Why the viral stat about the Lakers' sale misses the point on how real wealth is built.


A picture of Andrew Van Alstyne

Read Andrew’s Story


A picture of Magic Johnson and Jerry Buss with an overlay of a social media post comparing the sale price of the lakers vs the value in of the S&P 500 over the same period of time.

There's a fascinating piece of financial trivia that often circulates among investors and sports fans alike. It lays out a simple, and seemingly mind-blowing, comparison:

At first glance, the takeaway seems simple: even owning a storied franchise like the Los Angeles Lakers couldn't beat a simple index fund. But for savvy owners, advisors, and executives, this comparison immediately raises red flags. It represents a fundamental misunderstanding of how strategic wealth is built, and it overlooks the immense financial and personal advantages of business ownership.

This article is for anyone who suspects there's more to the story. We’re going to go beyond the surface-level analysis and break down what the one-dimensional math ignores, from the real financial returns to the priceless advantages that ownership provides.


Key Takeaways:

  • IRR vs. ROI: When accounting for leverage and annual cash flow, the Lakers investment likely produced an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) more than double that of the S&P 500.

  • Tax Efficiency: Business owners can use before-tax dollars and deductions (like Section 179 and QBI) to significantly increase their financial efficiency compared to passive investors.

  • Priceless Returns: The true value of ownership includes non-financial returns like legacy, hands-on experience, and networking opportunities that an index fund cannot provide.


The Problem with the $13 Billion Number

Let me be clear: the S&P 500 is a fantastic investment tool, and its long-term performance is a powerful force for passive wealth creation. The problem isn’t with the index; it's with using it as a simplistic benchmark against a complex, multi-faceted asset like a business. The headline comparison falls apart under the weight of two realities that every business owner understands intuitively: Leverage and Cash Flow.

One arm of a gold balance scale with coins in the tray

The Initial Investment Wasn't $67.5 Million in Cash

The first flaw in the comparison is the initial figure. Jerry Buss was a master of the deal. The $67.5 million transaction was for a portfolio of assets that included the Lakers (NBA), the Los Angeles Kings (NHL), The Forum arena, and a 13,000-acre ranch. More importantly, the deal was incredibly complex and highly leveraged. It involved multiple escrows, property swaps (including a transaction involving the Chrysler Building), and the efforts of over 50 lawyers. While the exact cash out of his pocket is not public, reports from the time estimated that Buss’s actual cash invested in the entire transaction may have been as low as $125,000, not including closing costs. Another analysis suggests his down payment was closer to $16 million. Let's be conservative and use the higher figure. If a $16 million investment grows into a stake worth billions, the return multiple is astronomical; far exceeding the S&P 500. This is the power of using leverage to control an asset, a tool unavailable to a typical index fund investor.

The Final Sale Price Ignores 45 Years of Income

The second, and arguably bigger, flaw is that the $10B valuation only represents the asset's value at the end. It completely ignores the decades of annual income the Lakers generated for the Buss family. The Lakers are a financial powerhouse. Even going back a decade, Forbes estimated the team's operating income for 2015 was $133 million. For the 2022-2023 season, their revenue was $516 million with an operating income of $159 million. This doesn't even account for the team's league-leading local TV deal with Spectrum SportsNet, worth hundreds of millions per year. While precise distributions are private, the publicly available data shows that the team generated billions in both revenue and profit over the Buss family's ownership tenure. That profit is money that could be enjoyed, reinvested in other ventures, or used to more quickly service the very debt that bought the team in the first place. This is why, for complex assets, a simple return multiple is the wrong tool. The only way to properly measure a deal like this is with a metric that accounts for all the cash flows (in and out) over the entire life of the investment: the Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

A Tale of Two IRRs: The Headline vs. Reality

The table below models the two approaches. The first column details the 'headline' scenario, which assumes an unlevered $67.5 million investment in the S&P 500. The second column models the more realistic 'reality' scenario of a leveraged $16 million investment in the Lakers, including estimated annual distributions.

The key takeaway is staggering. The Lakers ownership deal generated nearly an identical total net profit, but did so using less than a quarter of the initial capital and produced an IRR that was more than double that of the S&P 500.



The Money You Don’t See (Cash Flow & Perks)

The fundamental error in the "S&P is better" argument is its failure to recognize that a business is not a static number on a screen; it’s a living, breathing engine designed to generate income. The final sale price of an asset like the Lakers ignores the decades of cash flow produced along the way. This ongoing financial benefit generally comes in two forms: direct compensation and integrated perks.

The Annual Paycheck: Salary & Distributions

Unlike a passive stock holding, a profitable business pays its owner. For an active owner, this typically begins with a reasonable salary for the work they perform in the company. This is the reward for the day-to-day effort of running the enterprise. But the more significant reward comes from the profits. After all expenses are paid, including that salary, the remaining profit (the "net income") belongs to the owner and can be taken as a distribution (or dividend). This is the direct return on investment an owner receives for their capital and risk. This ability to generate cash without selling the underlying asset is a cornerstone of an owner's financial freedom

The "Lifestyle Asset": An Apples-to-Apples Look at Your Dollars

Beyond direct pay, the ability to run legitimate expenses through a business creates a massive financial advantage through the power of paying with before-tax dollars versus after-tax dollars. To show the real-world impact, let's create a clear, apples-to-apples comparison using only the 2025 federal income tax brackets for simplicity. Imagine two individuals: one is a high-income salaried employee, and the other is a business owner. Both need a new $80,000 vehicle. For an employee at this income level, their earnings for that purchase alone would place them in the 24% federal marginal tax bracket if they were to purchase the vehicle outright. This means the last dollars they earn, the ones they'd use for a large purchase, could be taxed at an even higher rate.

  • The Salaried Employee:

    To have $80,000 in cash to buy the car, they must first earn that money and pay federal income tax on it. To get $80,000 of take-home pay, they would need to earn approximately $105,263. After paying 24% in federal taxes on those earnings (about $25,263), they are left with the $80,000 they need.

$105,263(Gross Pay)−$25,263(24%Federal Tax Owed)=$80,000(Net Pay)

  • The Business Owner:

    The owner also needs an $80,000 vehicle, which will be used solely for legitimate business purposes. The business can purchase the vehicle directly. That $80,000 is a business expense. Thanks to tax provisions like Section 179 or bonus depreciation, the business may be able to deduct the full purchase price from its income in the first year. This deduction reduces the business's taxable income by $80,000, saving the company (and by extension, the owner) $19,200 in federal taxes (24% of $80,000).

The Bottom-Line Impact

To afford the exact same vehicle, the employee had to use $105,263 of their gross earning power. The business owner, by using their company as the purchaser of the vehicle, effectively only used $60,800 of their earning power ($80,000 cost - $19,200 tax savings). This isn't a loophole; it's a fundamental principle of the tax code designed to encourage business investment.



A Masterclass in Tax Efficiency

A man sitting at a wooden desk overlooking piles of paperwork

If cash flow is the engine of day-to-day wealth, then tax strategy is the high-performance oil that keeps that engine running at maximum efficiency. It's not about 'finding loopholes'; it's about strategically using a rulebook that is specifically designed to reward business investment and growth. For a business owner, the U.S. Tax Code provides a rich and dynamic playbook for legally minimizing tax liability. This advantage is built on three pillars: choosing the right foundation, understanding the full universe of deductions, and leveraging industry-specific opportunities.

The Foundation: Why Your Entity Structure is Your Financial Blueprint

Before a single dollar is earned, the most critical decision a business owner makes is choosing their entity structure. This choice dictates how profits are taxed, what deductions are available, and how the owner is compensated.

  • LLC (Limited Liability Company):

    A popular starting point, the LLC is a legal entity (not a tax entity) that offers liability protection. Many sole proprietors will elect to have this treated as a "disregarded entity" for tax purposes, making filing simpler as it can all be done on their personal return: the 1040. As income increases, the next step is to choose how the entity is taxed.

  • S-Corporation (S-Corp):

    For many profitable small businesses, the S-Corp is the gold standard of tax efficiency. It allows the owner to pay themselves a reasonable salary (subject to payroll taxes) and then take any additional profits as distributions. These distributions are not subject to self-employment taxes, which can result in thousands of dollars in annual tax savings compared to taking all compensation as salary.

  • C-Corporation (C-Corp):

    The structure of major enterprises like the Lakers, a C-Corp is a separate tax-paying entity. While its profits are subject to corporate income tax, potentially leading to double taxation, it offers maximum flexibility for growth, raising capital, and providing more extensive, and deductible, employee benefits; many of which can also be additional forms of compensation for the owner.

The Universe of Deductions: Lowering Taxable Income Year After Year

Once the structure is set, owners can leverage a vast array of legitimate business expenses to lower their taxable income. We saw the power of this with the vehicle example, but it extends much further into building personal wealth.

A Deeper Dive: Super-Charging Retirement Savings

This is where your choice of entity becomes incredibly powerful. A primary example is in retirement savings. While a traditional employee might be limited to their company's 401(k), a business owner can establish plans with dramatically higher contribution limits. Let's look at the popular Solo 401(k) for an owner with no employees. For 2025, the savings potential is split into two parts:

  1. The Employee Contribution: The owner acts as their own "employee" and can defer up to 100% of their salary, up to a maximum of $23,500 for 2025.

  2. The Employer Contribution: The business then acts as the "employer" and can contribute up to 25% of the owner's compensation. The power is in combining them. The total contributions from both sources cannot exceed $70,000 for 2025. This allows a business owner to save nearly three times more in a tax-advantaged account than a typical employee, drastically reducing their current taxable income while accelerating their retirement goals. A SEP IRA is another strong option, consisting solely of employer contributions up to 25% of compensation.

This entire strategy is made possible by the salary and compensation structure you can create with the right business entity.

For owners looking to save even more aggressively, a Cash Balance Plan can be a powerful tool. This is a type of "private pension" that allows for massive, age-dependent, tax-deductible contributions that can often exceed six figures annually. These plans can also be used in addition to a 401(k), allowing for a stacked approach that can drastically reduce a high-income owner's tax bill while rapidly building wealth.

Other High-Impact Deductions

Beyond retirement, an owner has a toolkit of other powerful deductions to enhance financial efficiency:

  • The Qualified Business Income (QBI) Deduction: Also known as Section 199A, this is one of the most significant deductions available to owners of pass-through businesses (S-Corps, partnerships, sole proprietorships). It allows for a deduction of up to 20% of qualified business income directly from your taxable income. It's a complex deduction with limitations based on income level and business type, but for those who qualify, it's an incredibly powerful tax-saving tool.

  • Health Insurance Premiums: For self-employed individuals and S-Corp owners, the cost of health insurance premiums is often 100% deductible, turning a major personal expense into a significant tax deduction. For businesses electing to file as a C-Corp, the premiums for all employees are deductible to the business.

  • Asset Depreciation: This is a game-changer. When a business buys a significant asset: be it manufacturing equipment, computer hardware, or even a sports stadium; it can deduct the cost over time. Provisions like Section 179 and bonus depreciation often allow an owner to deduct the entire cost of an asset in the year it was purchased, creating a massive, immediate reduction in taxable income.

Industry-Specific Opportunities: It's Not Just for Sports Teams

Different industries also benefit from tailored tax incentives designed to encourage specific economic activities. This proves that tax advantages aren't just for billion-dollar franchises. Some examples are as follows:

  • Real Estate Investors: Beyond standard deductions, real estate professionals can use depreciation as a powerful tool to create losses that can offset other income. Advanced strategies like cost segregation studies can accelerate this depreciation, maximizing tax savings in the early years of owning a property.

  • Tech & Manufacturing: These industries can benefit from the R&D Tax Credit, a significant dollar-for-dollar credit for expenses related to innovation and improving products or processes.

  • Professional Services (Doctors, Lawyers, Consultants): For these owners, the primary advantage often lies in optimizing the S-Corp structure for salary and distributions and maximizing contributions to sophisticated retirement plans, like a defined benefit or cash balance plan, which allow for even larger, six-figure deductions.



The Priceless Premiums: Legacy, Experience, and Opportunity

If we stopped after the financial analysis, we would still be missing the most important part of the story: the elements of ownership that don't appear on a balance sheet but represent what is often the deepest forms of wealth. An index fund can give you a return. A business can give you a life. This "builder's premium" is a powerful form of return that manifests in three key areas:

The Legacy Asset: Building for the Next Generation

You cannot teach executive-level life skills by showing your children a brokerage statement. An entrepreneur creates an environment where the next generation can gain hands-on experience. When Jerry Buss passed away, he didn't just leave his children stock; he left them an empire. This is the ultimate goal for many entrepreneurs: creating a generational asset that provides purpose and opportunity not only for them, but those they most care about.

The Experiential Return: The 'Fun' Factor

A purely numerical comparison misses a simple, undeniable fact: the journey of building a business is often its own reward. The passion, the challenges, and the victories create a psychological income that can be more valuable than any financial return. The word "wealth" itself is derived from an Old English term for a state of being happy and healthy, not the financial riches that we often equate it with in modern times.

The Opportunity Network: Doors Opened and Deals Done

Owning a significant business creates a universe of opportunities that passive investing cannot. It puts you in rooms with other high-level operators, investors, and centers of influence. This network is, in itself, an asset that can lead to new ventures and strategic partnerships far beyond the scope of the original business.


Are You Building a Nest Egg or an Empire?

So, where does this leave our comparison? We've seen that the initial headline stat withers under scrutiny when you account for leverage, cash flow, and tax efficiency. The financial return on an asset like the Lakers is in a different universe than that of a passive index. But the analysis runs deeper. We've explored the benefits that can't be quantified: legacy, experience, and other opportunities.

The S&P 500 is an exceptional tool for building wealth passively. But it is just that: a tool. It is not an engine for creating a family legacy or a tax-efficient cash flow machine. To compare it to owning and building a business isn't just comparing apples to oranges; it's comparing a passenger train to a rocket ship. Both can move you forward, but they operate in entirely different dimensional planes with vastly different purposes.

Ultimately, your financial strategy must reflect what you are trying to build. If your goal is simply a number, a passive approach may be sufficient. But if you are building an engine for your family, for your life, for your future; you need a financial partner who understands that your business may be your most powerful asset. You need a plan that enhances its growth, not one that fights it.



Recent Articles Written By Andrew:

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Is owning a business a better investment than the S&P 500? A: While the S&P 500 is an excellent passive tool, this analysis shows that a well-run business, utilizing leverage, cash flow, and tax advantages, can offer a significantly higher Internal Rate of Return and provides non-financial benefits like legacy and experience.

Q: What is the biggest tax advantage of an S-Corp? A: A primary advantage is the ability to pay yourself a "reasonable salary" and take remaining profits as distributions, which are not subject to self-employment taxes.

Q: What is the IRR? A: The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is a financial metric that calculates an investment's profitability by accounting for all cash inflows and outflows over its entire lifetime, making it more accurate for complex assets than a simple return on investment.

Recent Publications Featuring Andrew:

Podcasts Featuring Andrew:


Fiduciary Financial Advisors, LLC is a registered investment adviser and does not give legal or tax advice. Information presented is for educational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any securities. The information contained herein has been obtained from a third-party source which is believed to be reliable but is subject to correction for error. Investments involve risk and are not guaranteed. Past performance is not a guarantee or representation of future results.

Fiduciary Financial Advisors does not give legal or tax advice. The information contained does not constitute a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any security and does not purport to be a complete statement of all material facts relating to the strategies and services mentioned.

 
All images designed by Freepik.com
Next
Next

Why Your Financial Plan Should Include More Than Just Investments